by Rod D. Martin
August 12, 2005

Oh, and one other thing. Why is it that when minor pro bono work for some gay rights people comes up — work which did not involve actually representing them, and which was never repeated on any case for any similar group in his entire career — Ann Coulter et al. say this proves he’s pro-homosexual; but when umpteen cases are cited wherein Roberts personally argued before the Supreme Court that Roe v. Wade should be overturned, the same Ann Coulter et al. say he was just representing his client and his arguments don’t tell us anything about his true beliefs?

So which is it? It can’t be both.