About Rod D. Martin
Praise for Rod D. Martin
Book Rod to Speak
Politics & Economics
Technology & Markets
Faith & Culture
by Rod D. Martin
April 16, 2015
Are Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton inevitable? No. But the reasons aren’t necessarily as you think.
Their advantages are certainly enormous. Both can raise truly vast sums of money. Both have the backing of their respective establishments (although to be fair, that backing is imperfect in both cases).
More important by far is what they share on the ground: organizational depth. This is something the average American, busy with real life and not immersed in the world of activism (“organizing” for our leftist friends), doesn’t fully appreciate.
Our primary process is designed to give the little guy a chance: this is why we don’t have one big national primary. Iowa goes first because it’s representative of what the Beltway calls “flyover country;” it’s also light on media markets (which require big ad budgets and thus big fundraising early on) and heavy on retail: handshakes and hugs.
In Iowa, you get a pretty diverse cross section of America (on the R side this includes fiscal conservatives and libertarians who don’t like Christians, lots and lots of church-goers, people who love ethanol subsidies, you name it). It’s not New York, but it’s an interesting test, and it depends heavily on the candidate personally walking precincts, going door to door, meeting people in their homes again and again.
This is why in the last two elections Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum — both of them penniless — were able to win.
A win has big consequences: it vaults you to the head of the pack, it boosts your fundraising dramatically, and when there’s an upset winner like the ones just named, it levels the playing field rather thoroughly. Many a frontrunner has died in Iowa, frequently by trying to run a big budget media campaign when they needed to be eating a hot dog with some farmers at the fair. There are only so many ads you can run in Iowa: you have to win it on the ground. Money can help, but it’s hobbled. Everyone has a real chance.
New Hampshire is the same, but different: different people with different concerns and ideologies. What you do and say in Iowa can nuke you in New Hampshire. Moreover, Iowa has caucuses, while New Hampshire has a primary: each tests candidates in very different ways. But the person-to-person dynamic, and minimal media market, is the same. Anyone can win, and should they win both, they are probably about to win the whole thing.
From there it gets more complicated. But the priority of Iowa and New Hampshire is one of the greatest features of the American system. Like the electoral college, it keeps the moneyed interests and big city machines from rigging the game.
On a certain level, all of this hurts Jeb and Hillary. Indeed, Hillary lost Iowa in 2008, badly. An interesting, hard-working challenger could certainly upset her — or Jeb — again, greatly altering the overall race.
But this is where my point regarding organizational depth comes in. The advantage both candidates share — again, far more important than money — is time and relationships on the ground. Let me explain.
Imagine you’re a regular guy in one of these states. Maybe you’re a line worker at a plant. Maybe you’re a mechanic, or a car salesman. But you love politics. And for years now, you’ve been volunteering. You’re good enough at it, and willing enough to stick with it, that somewhere along the way you became a precinct captain: one of the people who actually organizes their neighbors and gets out the vote.
You’re not a political professional. But you’ve been around, and you know your community and it knows you. There are very few people who could know what you know, or do what you do.
If you’re old enough, you’ve done this several times before. In fact, you probably did it for George W. Bush, or Bill Clinton, or even George H.W. Bush. You’ve had a lot of Presidents in your living room, at least compared to the average American.
So what happens when Bill Clinton calls you — personally — to reminisce about old times? What happens when not one but two Republican presidents, 43 and 41, pick up the phone and ask you to “help me out just one more time.”
This is not a robocall. This is real. This is one, maybe two Presidents of the United States laughing and joking with you about that time that the two of you did…whatever.
Jeb and Hillary will get most of the best precinct captains. They’ll get most of the other leaders too, the ones who can get you in front of the right crowds, the right donors, the whole nine yards. Not just in Iowa and New Hampshire, but especially there. And if anything may make them inevitable, it’s that. The lead you can amass by winning those two states, and by blocking anyone from upsetting you, is probably insurmountable.
But there’s another side of that coin.
Familiarity is a two-edged sword in a culture obsessed with the new. And people are wary of a dynasty: you hear that everywhere now. But that’s not the thing.
The thing is, just as both of these candidates have personal history with thousands of activists going back decades — George H.W. Bush first ran for President in ’79 and ‘80 — they also have their favorites, their tried and true. It’s hard to break out of that: you know who’s good and you know who you want and you dance with who brung ya.
But there are a lot of new people since 1980, and 1992. There are a lot of people who’d like to break in. And precious few of them are going to be able to rise in Bushville or Clintonland: all the best places are long since spoken for.
If either of these candidates aren’t inevitable, that’s why. There’s a world of people who will have to wait their turn if Bush or Clinton win. A lot of them have waited a lifetime already; others don’t want to have to wait until they too are old. And for the many old enemies of one of these camps, the thought of another ten years of hell is downright frightening.
That’s a volatile, potent brew.
Hillary’s been inevitable before. And this was a significant part of her overthrow.
Dynasties are hard to maintain, even in monarchies: ask the Lancasters and Plantagenets, the Hohenzollerns and the Ming. Maybe everything’s already settled, and 2016 will be a bore.
I wouldn’t count on it.
Editor’s Note: This essay originally appeared in The Daily Caller. Please visit the original.
Rod is one of our nation’s leading minds. He’s smart, original, and very committed—a combination that one rarely finds.
Rod Martin and [former Howard Dean campaign manager] Joe Trippi are America’s two foremost experts on online politics.
Rod Martin is a Reaganite-Thatcherite conservative…[and] a man who has spent much of his life ministering to and working for the benefit of others. I know Rod as an advocate for freedom, a leader who understands the real changes we need in Washington, and who has the drive and ability to make those changes happen.
Rod Martin is the kind of dynamic leader who has the knowledge, ability and experience to lead us successfully into the 21st Century. His vision for America is compelling.
Rod Martin literally wrote the book on excellence. Humble yet brilliant, a man of love and compassion, with penetrating clarity he illuminates the world around us, and we are both stirred and enlightened.
Rod Martin is a born leader and an outstanding political mind. Anyone who takes him on is going to have a serious fight on their hands.
Rod Martin is a man of uncommon vision and character. Ever since I first worked alongside Rod in the early days of PayPal, I’ve been struck by his powerful vision for the future. Rod understands the intersection of technology, politics and culture in a way that few others do.
Rod Martin wears with uncommon grace an uncanny ability to link his vigorous faith to the practical challenges of both the business world and the political arena. Yet the respect he shows for others carries a warmth and modesty that are both too rare among those who are strong advocates of feisty positions.
America badly needs more leaders who really get the future. We need more Rod Martins.
Rod Martin is a modern day philosopher-statesman. He is a capitalist intellectual, a conservative iconoclast, a gentle adversary and a kind prophet. He inspires us towards a fresh national vision built upon the original founding principles.
Rod Martin is not only effective and efficient, but he is also perceptive, wise and gracious. He gets things done. He is a great friend and a great ally.
Rod is one of the sharpest, most gracious men I know, and one of the most gifted political thinkers today. His ability to analyze issues and communicate thoughtful insights on them have earned him the respect of people across the political spectrum.
I am proud to have been Rod Martin’s friend for a quarter century, and I can tell you that he is one of the finest men and most outstanding leaders in our church and in our country today. He has a knack for turning everything he touches to success.
Rod Martin is a cornucopian entrepreneur and eutropic thinker whose influence radiates through an array of companies, institutions, movements and churches. A renaissance American, he is also a prolific friend of freedom and faith around the globe.
If Rod Martin represents the next generation of leaders, America has nothing to worry about.
A leader and a servant, in public life and in private, Rod Martin strides at the top of his profession, and has nowhere to go but up. He is in the truest sense of the word ‘outstanding’.
Rod Martin is undoubtedly one of the most accomplished thought leaders today. He is a wonderful mentor, a humble role model, and a deep inspiration for the next generation of scientific innovators and entrepreneurs.
Rod’s achievements pale beside his character and his brilliance. He sees what others can’t. He leads when others won’t.
Rod Martin is one of America’s finest young minds.
You must be logged in to post a comment.