8 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Methinks too that part of the explanation is that the current iteration of the Democrat Party is not so much a political party operating under "our democracy," but a chimera masking a radical, Collectivist revolutionary organization.

As such, it is internally and inherently contradictory. And much of the public (if not yet a critical mass) is intuitively sensing the contradiction.

Recall David Horowitz's 2007 book "The Shadow Party" describing George Soros' and Hillary Clinton's (then underway) efforts to takeover and radicalize the Democrat Party, all while maintaining an out-pretense as the "party of working families" (i.e., camouflage).

Then consider that a year later B. Hussein Obama was elected President. His radical background was described in Stanley Kurtz's 2010 book "Radical in Chief." (BTW, it includes a brilliant description of how "public option" and the "subprime crisis" are / were deliberate tactics by the Left for undermining our economy and transforming us into a Collectivist model.)

B. Hussein Obama's stated occupation "community organizer" was a euphemism for a Marxist agitator, and the phrase (if not the techniques) were coined by one Saul Alinsky ("Rules for Radicals").

The same Alinsky for whom young Hillary Rodham (Clinton) was an acolyte (Alinsky even offered her a job).

Alinsky, in "Rules for Radicals," recommended that radicals (Gramsci-like) burrow into our system and pretend to be part of it, while subverting it from within -- the notorious concept Cultural Marxists to engage in a "long march through the institutions."

I would argue that both Hillary and Obama - who I suspect is also a Muslim Brotherhood fellow-traveler, if not actual operative - have been doing Alinsky's bidding.

Alas, once those Cultural Marxists / community organizers advance to a certain level, their radicalism must start to be revealed, for their agenda cannot assume control without (at some point) revealing it (at least in part).

The third Obama term (a/k/a the unelected Biden-Harris Junta) could not but help beginning to remove the mask. Perhaps driven by haste to consummate by the (for them) hallowed year of 2030, and make up time after the unanticipated delay of the first Trump term.

Hopefully, as DOGE and DOJ continue, the rest of their mask will, against their will, be ripped-off for all the world to see.

Expand full comment