The top fundraising platform is suspected of identity theft, credit card fraud, and other financial crimes. But money laundering by Democrat billionaires and foreign actors looks likely.
According to the article, an individual in Colorado, at the top of the list, allegedly made 57,138 contributions to ActBlue — one transaction every 1.3 days — altogether totaling no less than $234,441."
I'm not sure about the math. To show why, let's assume, for simplicity's sake, a slightly higher frequency of transactions, i.e. one every day instead of one every 1.3 days. Then $234,441 divided by 365 days, or one year -- works out to 156.54. In other words, it would take 156 and-a-half years of donations to reach the total amount.
That said, and to be honest, I'm not math genius. Am I missing something here?
Don't know. I don't have the timeframe in which this happened: the amounts are easily verifiable but come from news reports. I did not do the math myself.
That said, I get your $156.54 amount (give-or-take) over a four to six year period, which sounds right. Even if it were a decade or more it would still clearly be an attempt to evade campaign finance laws (not to mention other laws).
The Democrats will keep doing their thing, with multiple backup plans, always. But taking down ActBlue would be a very big deal, partly because the people involved are the best at what they're doing, partly because they've invested fortunes in the brand and would have to do so all over again if it goes down.
Is this the stake-through-the-heart that is about to be applied to the DNC or is this merely an inconvenience to the Demo-rats who will simply find another abusive donation avenue for them to circumvent election laws? It appears as though the DOGE house cleaning won't drain the swamp becasue another congressional reconciliation bill--a bill that contains USAID funding--is about to land on Trump's desk for his signature. Wash, rinse, repeat.
This is one of their central institutions, and some of their best people. So if some of those people go to jail, they'll be off the field of play, and if ActBlue itself goes down, it will be hard to replace.
It will be replaced, of course. But that will take time and resources that otherwise would have been spent beating us.
Thank you for all you do. I’ve learned a lot from you. I’m sharing your Substacks as well. I meant that I’d like to see this at least on Fox News or Newsmax.
Probably because Trump was only inaugurated about 50 days ago, and it took a while to confirm Bondi and Patel. They can't do everything at once, and it takes time to develop a case, convene grand juries, etc. But this is likely to be as big a deal as USAID, and it looks like some of the USAID money may have been funneled back to Democrats through ActBlue.
According to the article, an individual in Colorado, at the top of the list, allegedly made 57,138 contributions to ActBlue — one transaction every 1.3 days — altogether totaling no less than $234,441."
I'm not sure about the math. To show why, let's assume, for simplicity's sake, a slightly higher frequency of transactions, i.e. one every day instead of one every 1.3 days. Then $234,441 divided by 365 days, or one year -- works out to 156.54. In other words, it would take 156 and-a-half years of donations to reach the total amount.
That said, and to be honest, I'm not math genius. Am I missing something here?
Don't know. I don't have the timeframe in which this happened: the amounts are easily verifiable but come from news reports. I did not do the math myself.
That said, I get your $156.54 amount (give-or-take) over a four to six year period, which sounds right. Even if it were a decade or more it would still clearly be an attempt to evade campaign finance laws (not to mention other laws).
Another one is already open and ready to take its place. Smurfing is just too good of a scam to let go…
The Democrats will keep doing their thing, with multiple backup plans, always. But taking down ActBlue would be a very big deal, partly because the people involved are the best at what they're doing, partly because they've invested fortunes in the brand and would have to do so all over again if it goes down.
Is this the stake-through-the-heart that is about to be applied to the DNC or is this merely an inconvenience to the Demo-rats who will simply find another abusive donation avenue for them to circumvent election laws? It appears as though the DOGE house cleaning won't drain the swamp becasue another congressional reconciliation bill--a bill that contains USAID funding--is about to land on Trump's desk for his signature. Wash, rinse, repeat.
This is one of their central institutions, and some of their best people. So if some of those people go to jail, they'll be off the field of play, and if ActBlue itself goes down, it will be hard to replace.
It will be replaced, of course. But that will take time and resources that otherwise would have been spent beating us.
THEN DOWN IT GOES
HOPE TO GOD THIS IS SO
The Democratic Party is the party of scams, subterfuge and lies at this point! I hope this is all reported to the American people.
Obviously I'm doing what I can. But there's just so much, no one could ever cover it all, and not many are able to keep up.
Thank you for all you do. I’ve learned a lot from you. I’m sharing your Substacks as well. I meant that I’d like to see this at least on Fox News or Newsmax.
Seems like an obvious RICO case to me…why aren’t Fed prosecutors attacking vigorously?
Probably because Trump was only inaugurated about 50 days ago, and it took a while to confirm Bondi and Patel. They can't do everything at once, and it takes time to develop a case, convene grand juries, etc. But this is likely to be as big a deal as USAID, and it looks like some of the USAID money may have been funneled back to Democrats through ActBlue.
This case bears watching.
The scale of the corruption is just mind-blowing. And this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Soros Act Blue
Kindergarten sex Ed classes what moron writes they're curriculum
1.5 Million NGOs within the United States GET CBS NBC ABC MSNBC to do some investigative reporting instead of the braindead orange man bad Harris good
Vampire 🦇 News